Received-SPF: pass (Last token {ip4:208.93.164.0/22} (res=PASS)) client-ip=208.93.164.39; envelope-from=<ed@easent.net>; x-ip-name=charger.easent.net;
X-Received: from charger.easent.net (charger.easent.net [208.93.164.39])
by netwin.co.nz (SurgeMail 7.3h) with ESMTP id 273069-1391920
for <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:07:41 +0000
X-Return-Path: ed
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=easent.net;
s=default; t=1520611661;
bh=lxPhDIJo4q7h+a7tJ0ThBDEhleNvpzuwXoFa/c8D4Vw=;
h=Subject:To:From:Date:In-Reply-To;
b=GbOXT7YGIyGfeDPZWJ8+Nd5vApAZvTGlvHIo14qN8GpSQYdY3NZFlq9W7Ib7UfXV2
J7PWldAqPfjSL+6kvK0DmIBkt8nYommpFEqmtycEOlICVkOtTAvcbyzrNqcIj2ZVeq
8AzRa9ODWisG0Fjgwl8r5qWQA+JkCHA6nywc/8hY=
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=2001:4870:ca:0:208:93:164:2;
X-Received: from zr1.easent.net (unverified [2001:4870:ca:0:208:93:164:2])
by charger.easent.net (EAS*Ent Email v7.1f ipv6 enabled) with ESMTP (TLS) id 1971402-1912972
for <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 11:07:40 -0500
X-Return-Path: ed
Subject: Re: [SurgeMail List] unclean shutdown
To: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
From: Ed
Message-ID: <cb742a3e-a53a-c776-5c0b-f8f40cef3985@easent.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:07:40 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0707818C-3A66-407F-943B-893EDE2F6EC1@wilkes.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: 208.93.164.39
X-Country: code=US country="United States" ip=208.93.164.39
X-Rcpt-To: <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>
X-SpamDetect: ****: 4.4 sd=4.4 lv=0.00 nok=11/0 m=7 nf=0 Close 0.90(X-Phrase:isspam) 0.10(X-myrbl:Color=yellow) 0.24(yellow_noinfo) 0.28(X-Verify-Helo:+OK) 0.39(X-Country:States) 0.41(genuine) 0.41(dkimok) 0.44(X-LangGuess:English) 0.52(spfpass) 0.49(X-NotAscii:utf) Saned 5.0 Sval 4.4 bsan 5.0 Moved 5.0->4.4 Sval 4.4
X-NotAscii: charset=utf-8;
X-LangGuess: English
X-Probe: +OK nothing bad found
X-Phrase: IsSpam score=1.00
X-Verify-Helo: +OK charger.easent.net
Authentication-Results: netwin.co.nz header.from=ed@easent.net; dkim=pass (good signature)
X-MyRbl: Color=Yellow (rbl) Age=142 Spam=0 Notspam=0 Stars=0 Good=0 Friend=0 Surbl=0 Catch=0 r=0 ip=208.93.164.39
X-IP-stats: No info recorded yet ip=208.93.164.39
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:surgemail-list-leave@netwin.co.nz?subject=unsubscribe>
X-Mailing-List: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
List-ID: <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
If you look for the "swatch" process after you kill the main surge
process and then kill it you won't get that error.
We've been running on linux for years and never get that error when we
kill the "swatch" process after the rest of it.
--Ed
On 03/09/2018 11:01 AM, John Wilkes wrote:
> Both “tellmail shutdown” and "/etc/init.d/surgemail stop” finish quickly. The init.d/surgemail method takes a little longer because the script has a 9 second delay at the end to give the SurgeMail process some time to stop cleanly.
>
> I see the same problem on a new Centos 7 installation, so it is not unique to Ubuntu. With Centos, the system shutdown process waits 5 minutes for surgemail to shutdown before giving up. I always see the “unclean “ message in SurgeMail status after rebooting, unless I manually stop SurgeMail before shutting down the system.
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
EAS Enterprises LLC
World Class Web and Email Hosting Solutions
IPv6 ready today for your needs of tomorrow!
Ask us about dual-stacking your site
www.easent.net
|