Received-SPF: pass (Cache: Last token {include:_spf.customer.net} (res=PASS)) client-ip=64.235.150.236; envelope-from=<bob@serve.net>; x-ip-name=15pmail.ess.barracuda.com;
X-Received: from 15pmail.ess.barracuda.com (15pmail.ess.barracuda.com [64.235.150.236])
by netwin.co.nz (SurgeMail 7.3p) with ESMTP (TLS) id 8085568-1391920
for <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 18:21:32 +0000
X-Return-Path: bob
X-Received: from ganymede.customer.net (ganymede.customer.net [136.179.32.230]) by mx28.ess.sfj.cudaops.com (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 06 Feb 2019 18:21:29 +0000
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=192.168.10.11;
X-Received: from [192.168.10.11] (unverified [192.168.10.11])
by ganymede.customer.net (SurgeMail 7.2i) with ESMTP (TLS) id 6912420-1879441
for <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 10:21:29 -0800
X-Return-Path: bob
Subject: Re: [SurgeMail List] Gateway based on sender IP address
To: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
References: <ea09624f-1aae-1b53-21bd-980043d7b2a6@serve.net>
<83614242-97c6-2f56-1b38-613d4f61f92a@netwinsite.com>
<7f0e6295-af1d-1909-c5a2-1fd2bdfb9a21@serve.net>
<fb193bf0-629c-4dc1-b3ee-89f4ddcfc900@netwinsite.com>
From: Bob Fera
Message-ID: <415df2e9-cd36-7c89-13aa-929b2adb816c@serve.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 10:21:23 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fb193bf0-629c-4dc1-b3ee-89f4ddcfc900@netwinsite.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-X-Authenticated-User: rmf@zis.com
X-BESS-ID: 1549477289-637138-20977-149576-1
X-BESS-VER: 2019.1-r1902050106
X-BESS-Apparent-Source-IP: 136.179.32.230
X-BESS-Outbound-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-BESS-Outbound-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.209135 [from
cloudscan15.us-east-2a.ess.aws.cudaops.com]
Rule breakdown below
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------
0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.00 BSF_BESS_OUTBOUND META: BESS Outbound
X-BESS-Outbound-Spam-Status: SCORE=0.00 using account:ESS63616 scores of KILL_LEVEL=7.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, BSF_BESS_OUTBOUND
X-BESS-BRTS-Status:1
X-Originating-IP: 64.235.150.236
X-Country: code=US country="United States" ip=64.235.150.236
X-ORBS-Stamp: hostkarma_yellow, hostkarma_quitok
X-Rcpt-To: <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>
X-SpamDetect: ****: 4.1 sd=4.1 lv=0.00 nok=12/0 m=6 nf=0 Close 0.04(X-myrbl:Color=white) 0.90(X-Phrase:isspam) 0.75(X-Verify-Helo:-ERR) 0.30(StandardTLD) 0.40(X-NotAscii:utf) 0.44(X-LangGuess:English) 0.45(spfpass) 0.46(X-ORBS-Stamp:yellow) 0.50(X-Verify-Helo:wrongip) Saned 5.0 Sval 4.1 bsan 5.0 Moved 5.0->4.1 Sval 4.1
X-NotAscii: charset=utf-8
X-LangGuess: English
X-Probe: +OK skipped, known ip address
X-Phrase: IsSpam score=1.00
X-Verify-Helo: -ERR wrongip: 15pmail.ess.barracuda.com -> 209.222.*.* not in 64.235.150.236
X-Encryption: SSL encrypted
X-MyRbl: Color=White Age=532 Spam=0 Notspam=7 Stars=5 Good=4701 Friend=7090 Surbl=7 Catch=0 r=0.00097 ip=64.235.150.236
X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 0, First 11, in=277, out=0, spam=0 ip=64.235.150.236
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:surgemail-list-leave@netwin.co.nz?subject=unsubscribe>
X-Mailing-List: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
List-ID: <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
This message came from the internet, do not TRUST any links, do NOT enter your password on any website link from any email.
If I remove the "gateway" settings, will g_route and g_route_except
to behave the same way as g_gateway and g_gateway_ifnot for local
email addresses?
Bob Fera
I.T. Manager
Zenith Information Group
18757 Burbank Blvd., Suite 116
Tarzana, CA 91356
Phone: 818-206-8634 Ext. 160
Fax: 818-345-2605
www.zis.com
Members of NACHA
The Electronic Payments Association
On 2/5/2019 5:45 PM, Surgemail Support
wrote:
What I'm suggesting is remove g_gateway rule, and replace it
with g_route rule to send everything to the gateway, with the
exception... ?
ChrisP.
On 6/02/2019 2:22 PM, Bob Fera wrote:
Hmm, not sure....
I have g_gateway (domain=*) set to a smarthost, and ideally I'd
like to bypass that smarthost for messages coming from IP
address x.x.x.x. (I'm also utilizing g_gateway_ifnot.) Currently
the only case where I'm using g_route is to send mail destined
for one particular domain to a different host (sounds like I
could use g_gateway for that, too). How does g_route_except
interact with those other settings? In other words what takes
priority over what?
If we can't get this concept to work and I have to do the
routing based on sender email address, is there any way to
restrict that a particular sender email comes from a specific IP
address(es)? And, in that case, can "dest" in g_route be "*"
(i.e. use MX)?
Thanks,
Bob
Bob Fera
I.T. Manager
Zenith Information Group
18757 Burbank Blvd., Suite 116
Tarzana, CA 91356
Phone: 818-206-8634 Ext. 160
Fax: 818-345-2605
www.zis.com
Members of NACHA
The Electronic Payments Association
On 2/5/2019 4:57 PM, Surgemail
Support wrote:
Does this help you?
g_route_except "ip.address"
ChrisP.
On 6/02/2019 12:09 PM, Bob Fera
wrote:
Hello all,
I've been hunting around with no luck on this. Is there any
way to get Surgemail to send outbound mail to a specific
gateway/smarthost (or, more specifically in my case, no
smarthost) depending on the ip address the message came from
(i.e. the sender's ip address)? "g_route" does it based on
sender's email address, which I guess I'll use if I have to,
but in my particular case the IP address would be better.
Given that, does "g_route" allow "*" for the "dest" field
(i.e. use MX record to send directly and bypass the
smarthost)?
In other words, and for more context, I'm trying to get
emails generated by a specific system on my network to go
out directly rather than through my smarthost/scanning
service.
Thanks!
Bob
--
Bob Fera
I.T. Manager
Zenith Information Group
18757 Burbank Blvd., Suite 116
Tarzana, CA 91356
Phone: 818-206-8634 Ext. 160
Fax: 818-345-2605
www.zis.com
Members of NACHA
The Electronic Payments Association