Received-SPF: pass (Last token {+mx} (res=PASS)) client-ip=70.35.205.71; envelope-from=<lyle@lcrcomputer.info>; x-ip-name=ns3.lcrcomputer.net;
X-Received: from ns3.lcrcomputer.net (ns3.lcrcomputer.net [70.35.205.71])
by netwin.co.nz (SurgeMail 7.7j) with ESMTP (TLS) id 12180347-1391920
for <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>; Tue, 26 Dec 2023 20:40:40 +0000
X-Return-Path: lyle
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=67.175.209.228; envelope-from=<lyle@lcrcomputer.info>;
X-Received: from mail3.lcrcomputer.net (unverified [67.175.209.228])
by ns3.lcrcomputer.net (SurgeMail 7.7i) with ESMTP (TLS) id 585480-1235687
for <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>; Tue, 26 Dec 2023 20:40:39 +0000
X-Return-Path: lyle
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lcrcomputer.info;
s=default; t=1703623239;
bh=wNmt4FTYgnaELadsRegB2ZY2RZjPOD5i3mGFcGv0fbM=;
h=Date:Subject:To:From;
b=DwYG3L/RShgof3GA3VNGvLVR5K2FHkkNeleTuMjHBESguYqGDQW2K2R+2XfNAxI/m
FKQqPgGXZtuYNvt/rlRlxsPl4oA6mQWVuU6wXjEQnvNR4ZfJ6nhbheQBHODw6vKJZa
J4q9PCat4wMzkzQe5CgXlxkYgzyhb2hQ3Savlj8A=
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=192.168.250.160; envelope-from=<lyle@lcrcomputer.info>;
X-Received: from [192.168.250.160] (unverified [192.168.250.160])
by mail3.lcrcomputer.net (SurgeMail 7.7i) with ESMTP (TLS) id 305591-1794114
for <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>; Tue, 26 Dec 2023 14:40:38 -0600
X-Return-Path: lyle
Message-ID: <df5090a7-ed3e-482c-9558-b37cc7df5e3c@lcrcomputer.info>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 14:40:38 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [SurgeMail List] using ClamAV with Surgemail
Content-Language: en-US
To: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
References: <aaa8c0e9-dbaf-44a6-9af0-f85dcb967cef@lcrcomputer.info>
<c2049216-eaa0-4998-9148-8e0618cea2a4@netwin.co.nz>
<d18425f8-5908-43aa-9246-ff98cc6c475b@lcrcomputer.info>
<3a3ad8f5-c8da-4225-b8ad-e125625af067@netwin.co.nz>
From: Lyle Giese
In-Reply-To: <3a3ad8f5-c8da-4225-b8ad-e125625af067@netwin.co.nz>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-X-Authenticated-User: lyle@lcrcomputer.com
X-X-Qnum: 585480
X-X-Authenticated-User: auth_admin@ns3.lcrcomputer.net
X-Originating-IP: 70.35.205.71
X-Country: code=US country="United States" ip=70.35.205.71
X-Qnum: 12180347
X-Rcpt-To: <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>
X-SpamDetect: ***: 3.3 sd=3.3 lv=6.69 nok=10/3 m=12 nf=0 Close 0.04(X-myrbl:Color=white) 0.90(X-Phrase:isspam) 0.37(X-Verify-Helo:+OK) 0.37(dkimok) 0.39(X-NotAscii:utf) 0.46(spfpass) 0.53(X-PhraseHits:scam) 0.49(StandardTLD) 0.49(X-LangGuess:English) Sval 3.3 bsan 6.7 Moved 6.7->3.3 Sval 3.3
X-NotAscii: charset=utf-8;
X-LangGuess: English
X-Phrase: IsSpam score=1.00
X-Verify-Helo: +OK ns3.lcrcomputer.net
X-Dmarc: from=lyle@lcrcomputer.info dkim=Good known=True spf=True policy=none
Authentication-Results: netwin.co.nz header.from=lcrcomputer.info; dkim=pass (good signature)
X-Encryption: SSL encrypted
X-MyRbl: Color=White Age=116 Spam=0 Notspam=0 Stars=0 Good=5 Friend=2 Surbl=0 Catch=0 r=0 ip=70.35.205.71
X-IP-stats: Incoming Outgoing Last 0, First 1076, in=1010, out=117, spam=0 Known=true ip=70.35.205.71
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:surgemail-list-leave@netwin.co.nz?subject=unsubscribe>
X-Mailing-List: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
List-ID: <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
on the issue of bounced vs dropped, let me watch the system for a bit
and I will get back to you on this argument<GRIN>! I saw some things
that I don't like and will better document them and get back to you on
this one.
But Hotmail/Outlook.com/Microsoft has already destroyed that trust. I
was watching the stories on the Mail Ops mail list with great interest
with multiple stories of Microsoft dropping valid email in to the bit
bucket.
Thanks for the advice on g_virus_skip and comma separated lists. I don't
anticipate large numbers here, just a small number.
Thanks!
Lyle
On 12/26/23 14:24, Surgemail Support wrote:
>
> On 27/12/2023 9:06 am, Lyle Giese wrote:
>>
>> Yes, many think dropping a message is not a good idea. But a message
>> that is a virus needs to be dropped.
>>
> Sorry I think this is an issue with our use of those terms, in our
> 'usage'...
>
> bounced = the sender gets an error message indicating the message
> did not get delivered.
>
> dropped = no one gets an error, the message 'vanishes' without
> trace and no one is informed.
>
> We don't think a message should 'ever' be dropped (vanished) because
> it destroys trust in the email system and creates a nightmare for
> people trying to trace problems.
>
>> They can be construed as malicious and can damage sender reputation.
>> I am quit aware of the plus and minus of dropping vs bouncing and
>>
>> want to drop anything ClamAV doesn't like. Plus many of these don't
>> have a valid return address on them...
>>
> We don't use the return address. The sender will only get an error if
> they are the real sender.
>
>> With 'g_virus_skip', how would I add a second or third email address
>> to be skipped, if needed?
>>
> Comma separated list should work.
>
> ChrisP.
>
>
>
|