X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=115-188-33-81.jetstream.xtra.co.nz;
X-Received: from [10.0.0.168] (115-188-33-81.jetstream.xtra.co.nz [115.188.33.81])
by netwin.co.nz (SurgeMail 7.3f) with ESMTP (TLS) id 4018092-1391920
for <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 20:42:41 +0000
X-Return-Path: surgemail-support
Subject: Re: [SurgeMail List] server hardware upgrade and migration question
To: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
References: <43A37C30-9CF0-4B38-B71D-9BC7E4A5EB78@wilkes.com>
<c6dc1353-b364-f17d-f355-1064432b43c4@netwinsite.com>
<74DA2AB2-DE3D-470B-AF4E-4FC9C18DA97F@wilkes.com>
<567e63df-315f-c14d-e671-ba5c50fa2b02@netwinsite.com>
<286522B4-5A75-43D2-B04E-A172F4AA29A1@wilkes.com>
<ea32d682-8147-8b69-3ec1-de11513e6036@netwinsite.com>
<FC7AFD19-9AB4-4033-A29E-9CA3DD1D8663@wilkes.com>
From: surgemail-support
Message-ID: <5782c73f-8dfe-0f02-f726-aad75a6ab2f2@netwinsite.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:42:35 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <FC7AFD19-9AB4-4033-A29E-9CA3DD1D8663@wilkes.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Authenticated-User: surgemail-support
X-Rcpt-To: <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>
X-SpamDetect: : 0.000000
X-Info: aspam skipped due to (g_smite_skip_relay)
X-Encryption: SSL encrypted
X-MyRbl: Color=Yellow Age=1 Spam=0 Notspam=0 Stars=0 Good=0 Friend=4 Surbl=0 Catch=0 r=0 ip=115.188.33.81
X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 0, First 1, in=18, out=0, spam=0 ip=115.188.33.81
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:surgemail-list-leave@netwin.co.nz?subject=unsubscribe>
X-Mailing-List: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
List-ID: <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Interesting, is this after running an additional tellmail resync?
Can you send me the output of :
tellmail status
from both systems.
And then try this:
tellmail resync_user
john@wilkes.com
Let it finish, then check those folders again, is the problem gone?
ChrisP.,
On 5/12/2017 6:57 p.m., John Wilkes
wrote:
In every case it looks like the size reported by “du” is smaller on the mirror. Some examples:
on the server:
180772K /var/surgemail/wilkes.com/va/wb/john/mdir/2016%2e07-09
193284K /var/surgemail/wilkes.com/va/wb/john/mdir/2016%2e10-12
279688K /var/surgemail/wilkes.com/va/wb/john/mdir/2017%2e01-03
148552K /var/surgemail/wilkes.com/va/wb/john/mdir/2017%2e04-06
on the mirror:
151540K /var/surgemail/wilkes.com/va/wb/john/mdir/2016%2e07-09
144000K /var/surgemail/wilkes.com/va/wb/john/mdir/2016%2e10-12
156480K /var/surgemail/wilkes.com/va/wb/john/mdir/2017%2e01-03
110876K /var/surgemail/wilkes.com/va/wb/john/mdir/2017%2e04-06
Looking at one of those directories, /var/surgemail/wilkes.com/va/wb/john/mdir/2016%2e07-09, there are more files on the server than on the mirror:
server: ls -1 /var/surgemail/wilkes.com/va/wb/john/mdir/2016%2e07-09 | wc -l
3643
mirror: ls -1 /var/surgemail/wilkes.com/va/wb/john/mdir/2016%2e07-09 | wc -l
3383
Here is part of a context diff of the output of “ls -1” from mirror and server:
$ diff -c ls-1-mirror.out ls-1-mail.out
*** ls-1-mirror.out 2017-12-04 21:23:35.775993890 -0800
--- ls-1-mail.out 2017-12-04 21:24:31.109474252 -0800
***************
*** 11,16 ****
--- 11,17 ----
u1009~2,S(0,1888)[1467415418]
u1010~2,S(0,66783)[1467444553]
u1011~2,S(0,65102)[1467450827]
+ u1012~2,S(0,34034)[1467463028]
u101~2,S(0,87675)[1467877535]
u1013~2,S(0,63565)[1467464861]
u1014~2,S(0,67470)[1467489698]
***************
*** 29,34 ****
--- 30,36 ----
u1026~2,S(0,97501)[1467667206]
u1027~2,S(0,56112)[1467684236]
u1028~2,S(0,3675)[1467697203]
+ u1029~2,S(0,103202)[1467724783]
u10~2,S(0,109174)[1467406715]
u1030~2,S(0,60523)[1467731066]
u1031~2,S(0,33183)[1467733985]
***************
Only the mirror is missing files; there are no files on the mirror that do not appear on the server. The directory in the output above is old archived mail, and is static; i.e. no changes were made on the server or the mirror while gathering this information. The “extra” files on the server are legitimate messages which should have been sent to the mirror.
I am running SurgeMail version 7.3c3-3 on both server and mirror. The mirror is a fresh installation (after a disk crash on the previous mirror hardware). The server has been running SurgeMail for many years and has been upgraded several times, most recently from version 6.3c to 7.3c-3 a few months ago.
--
I'd really appreciate it if you could take a moment to
like us on FaceBook, thanks heaps! ChrisP.