Received-SPF: pass (Last token {ip4:69.159.224.112} (res=PASS)) client-ip=69.159.224.112; envelope-from=<nospam@eton.ca>; x-ip-name=otwaon23-1168105584.sdsl.bell.ca;
X-Received: from mail.eton.ca (otwaon23-1168105584.sdsl.bell.ca [69.159.224.112])
by netwin.co.nz (SurgeMail 7.3f) with ESMTP id 5302879-1391920
for <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 20:14:01 +0000
X-Return-Path: nospam
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=192.168.2.100;
Subject: Re: [SurgeMail List] What are the best RBL lists to use at the
moment?
To: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
References: <5a558087.ae8.9d8.77e4@html.com.au>
<E292B28C-55C6-4DF1-B9AD-4C0F3508EFA7@thegoffs.net>
From: Neil Herber (nospam)
Message-ID: <5cfe4290-e0c3-dc6c-f819-c53e584325c2@eton.ca>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:14:02 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E292B28C-55C6-4DF1-B9AD-4C0F3508EFA7@thegoffs.net>
Content-Language: en-US
X-X-Authenticated-User: nospam@eton.ca
X-Mfilter: version 20150204_ec
X-Originating-IP: 69.159.224.112
X-Country: code=CA country="Canada" ip=69.159.224.112
X-Rcpt-To: <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>
X-SpamDetect: ****: 4.3 sd=4.3 lv=0.00 nok=6/0 m=3 nf=0 Close 0.04(X-myrbl:Color=white) 0.90(X-Phrase:isspam) 0.82(X-Verify-Helo:-ERR) 0.46(X-NotAscii:utf) 0.47(X-LangGuess:English) 0.52(Some tags-to-text) 0.49(spfpass) Saned 5.0 Sval 4.3 bsan 5.0 Moved 5.0->4.3 Sval 4.3
X-NotAscii: charset=utf-8
X-LangGuess: English
X-Probe: +OK skipped, known ip address
X-Phrase: IsSpam score=1.00
X-Verify-Helo: -ERR missmatch: mail.eton.ca->69.159.224.112->otwaon23-1168105584.sdsl.bell.ca
X-MyRbl: Color=White Age=140 Spam=0 Notspam=0 Stars=4 Good=42 Friend=45 Surbl=0 Catch=0 r=0.00035 ip=69.159.224.112
X-IP-stats: Incoming Outgoing Last 0, First 140, in=6928, out=103, spam=0 Known=true ip=69.159.224.112
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:surgemail-list-leave@netwin.co.nz?subject=unsubscribe>
X-Mailing-List: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
List-ID: <surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: surgemail-list@netwin.co.nz
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I use the following:
RBL action percentage of all RBL hits
b.barracudacentral.org deny 34%
bl.spamcop.net stamp 1%
zen.spamhaus.org deny 65%
If I remember correctly, SurgeMail will try all RBLs in turn in
the order listed but stops as soon as it gets a hit. So in my case
I should probably drop spamcop (since 1% hits isn't worth the
processing time) and put spamhaus first and barracuda second.
Can a Netwin person confirm that my memory is correct - or
correct it, please. ;-)
Thanks
Neil
On 2018-01-10 1:56 PM, Stephen D. Goff
wrote:
I got way too many false positives from spamcop.
On January 9, 2018 9:55:03 PM EST, Tom
Cross
<tomc@html.com.au> wrote:
Hi
At the moment we are using the
following
Suggestions welcome.
zen.spamhaus.org deny
cbl.abuseat.org deny
b.barracudacentral.org deny
bl.spamcop.net deny
dnsbl.sorbs.net STAMP
list.dnswl..org accept
tom cross
m: 0418 295 336
partner HTMLnet.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my
brevity.
--
Neil Herber